ZHANG Dong，SUN Zhilei，ZHANG Xilin，et al. Research progress of multi-azimuth acquisition and imaging technology of wide-tow multi-sources dual-sensor streamer[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology，2022，42(4)：194-206. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2021110801
Citation: ZHANG Dong，SUN Zhilei，ZHANG Xilin，et al. Research progress of multi-azimuth acquisition and imaging technology of wide-tow multi-sources dual-sensor streamer[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology，2022，42(4)：194-206. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2021110801
shu

Research progress of multi-azimuth acquisition and imaging technology of wide-tow multi-sources dual-sensor streamer

  • 1.

    Key Laboratory of Gas Hydrate, Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266237, China

  • 2.

    Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resources, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China

More Information
  • Received Date: November 07, 2021
  • Revised Date: March 19, 2022
  • Accepted Date: March 19, 2022
  • Available Online: August 08, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Wide-tow multi-sources dual-sensor streamer multi-azimuth acquisition and imaging technology has been successfully introduced into commercial seismic exploration projects. It improves the resolution of near-bottom strata and deep seismic images. This paper details this novel acquisition and imaging technique. This paper summarizes its application effect in the identification of near-seabed strata and deep target geological bodies in the North Sea, offshore Malaysia, the Barents Sea and other sea areas. The acquisition solution innovatively combines dual-sensor streamers, wide-tow multi-sources, and different length streamer arrangements with the new multi-azimuth acquisition. The Complete wavefield imaging combines reflection tomography, full waveform inversion (FWI), and separated wavefield imaging (SWIM). Its advantages mainly include: (1) Significantly weaken the influence of rough sea surface reflection and broaden the seismic frequency band. (2) Improve the signal-to-noise ratio, spatial sampling density, acquisition efficiency and velocity model accuracy. (3) Realize near offset uniform coverage and cost-effective multi-azimuth lighting. It can perform high-resolution imaging of near-seabed formations and deep geological targets, especially in shallow marine environmental conditions. It provides a cost-effective solution for imaging geological bodies at different depths.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (46)
  • [1]
    Widmaier M, O’Dowd D, Roalkvam C. Redefining marine towed-streamer acquisition [J]. First Break, 2019, 37(11): 57-62. doi: 10.3997/1365-2397.2019035
    [2]
    Widmaier M, Oukili J, Roalkvam C, et al. Maximizing quality and efficiency of multisensor streamer seismic with an ultra-wide penta-source configuration[C]//SEG/AAPG/SEPM First International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy. Denver, Colorado, USA: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2021: 61-65.
    [3]
    Widmaier M, O’Dowd D. Strategies for high-resolution towed-streamer acquisition and imaging of shallow targets[C]//2017 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting. Houston, Texas: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2017: 186-190.
    [4]
    张旭东, 文鹏飞, 徐云霞, 等. 双源单缆方式采集的天然气水合物三维地震数据采集脚印分析与压制处理[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2015, 31(9):55-61

    ZHANG Xudong, WEN Pengfei, XU Yunxia, et al. Footprint analysis and suppress processing of dual-source and single cable 3D seismic data for gas hydrate [J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2015, 31(9): 55-61.
    [5]
    Widmaier M, O'Dowd D. Addressing imaging challenges in the Viking Graben with multi-azimuth acquisition, longer offsets, and wide-tow sources[C]//SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting. Virtual: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2020: 21-25.
    [6]
    赵思为, 周超. 浅海地区工程地震勘探多次波消除方法应用[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2019, 16(5):635-641 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7940.2019.05.013

    ZHAO Siwei, ZHOU Chao. Application of multi-wave elimination methods of engineering seismic exploration to shallow sea [J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2019, 16(5): 635-641. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7940.2019.05.013
    [7]
    Barnes S R, Hegge R F, Schumacher H, et al. Improved shallow water demultiple with 3D multi-model subtraction[C]//2015 SEG Annual Meeting. New Orleans, Louisiana: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2015: 4460-4464.
    [8]
    Lu S P, Whitmore N, Valenciano A, et al. A practical crosstalk attenuation method for separated wavefield imaging[C]//2016 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting. Dallas, Texas: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2016: 4235-4239.
    [9]
    Wang P, Jin H Z, Yang M, et al. A model-based water-layer demultiple algorithm [J]. First Break, 2014, 32(3): 63-68.
    [10]
    Osnes B, Day A, Widmaier M, et al. First 3-D dual-sensor streamer acquisition in the North Sea - an example from the Luno field[C]//72nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2010. Geneva: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2010.
    [11]
    Reiser C, Mueller E, Multi-azimuth multisensor quantitative interpretation: a South Viking graben case study, Norway[J]. First Break, 2021, 39(9): 79-84.
    [12]
    Beaumont S, Söllner W. Multi-azimuth prestack time migration for general anisotropic, weakly heterogeneous media-field data examples[C]//75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013. London, UK: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2013.
    [13]
    Widmaier M T. Mitigating uncertainties in towed streamer acquisition and imaging by survey planning[C]//77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition-Workshops. Madrid, Spain: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2015: 1-5.
    [14]
    Oukili J, Limonta L, Bubner M, et al. Revealing new opportunities with a cost-effective towed-streamer MAZ solution in the South Viking Graben, Norway [J]. First Break, 2020, 38(11): 95-101. doi: 10.3997/1365-2397.fb2020085
    [15]
    Lu S P, Whitmore D N, Valenciano A A, et al. Separated-wavefield imaging using primary and multiple energy [J]. The Leading Edge, 2015, 34(7): 770-778. doi: 10.1190/tle34070770.1
    [16]
    Feuilleaubois L O, Charoing V, Maioli A, et al. Utilizing a novel quantitative interpretation workflow to derisk shallow hydrocarbon prospects-a Barents Sea case study [J]. First Break, 2017, 35(3): 85-92.
    [17]
    Rønholt G, Lie J E, Korsmo Ø, et al. Broadband velocity model building and imaging using reflections, refractions and multiples from dual-sensor streamer data[C]//14th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society & Expogef. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2015: 1-5.
    [18]
    O'Dowd D, Widmaier M, Roalkvam C, et al. Redefining high resolution multi-azimuth towed streamer acquisition on the Norwegian continental shelf[C]//EAGE 2020 Annual Conference & Exhibition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2020.
    [19]
    Long A S, Lu S, Whitmore D, et al. Mitigation of the 3D cross-line acquisition footprint using separated wavefield imaging of dual-sensor streamer seismic[C]//75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013. London, UK: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2013.
    [20]
    Rongfu S, Hua C, Yun W, et al. Improved interpretability via dual-sensor towed streamer 3D seismic-a case study from East China Sea[C]//76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014. Amsterdam, Netherlands: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2014: 1-4.
    [21]
    Ciotoli M, Beaumont S, Oukili J, et al. Dual-sensor data and enhanced depth imaging sheds new light onto the mature Viking Graben area [J]. First Break, 2016, 34(9): 73-79.
    [22]
    Baardman R, Van Borselen R. Separating sources in marine simultaneous shooting acquisition - Method & applications[C]//2012 SEG Annual Meeting. Las Vegas, Nevada: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2012: 1-5.
    [23]
    Beitz M, Strand C, Baardman R H. Constraint of dithering of source actuations: US, 20180052248[P]. 2018-02-22.
    [24]
    Langhammer J, Bennion P. Triple-source simultaneous shooting (TS3), a future for higher density seismic?[C]//77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2015. Madrid, Spain: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2015: 1-5.
    [25]
    Duan L, Bekara M, Baardman R H, et al. A practical method for multi-source deblending using spatio-temporal compressive sensing[C]//79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2017. Paris, France: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2017.
    [26]
    Hager E, Fontana P. Penta source: high-resolution marine seismic from shallow to deep water[C]//79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2017. Paris, France: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2017: 1-5.
    [27]
    Widmaier M, Tønnessen R, Oukili J, et al. Recent advances with wide-tow multi-sources in marine seismic streamer acquisition and imaging [J]. First Break, 2020, 38(12): 75-79. doi: 10.3997/1365-2397.fb2020093
    [28]
    Korsmo Ø, Marinets S, Naumann S, et al. Full waveform inversion and ambiguities related to strong anisotropy in exploration areas–case study Barents Sea[C]//78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016. Vienna, Austria: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2016: 1-5.
    [29]
    Naumann S, Widmaier M, Rønholt G. Novel variable streamer length acquisition tailored to full waveform inversion and high resolution imaging[C]//81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019. London, UK: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2019: 1-5.
    [30]
    Long A. Source and streamer towing strategies for improved efficiency, spatial sampling and near offset coverage [J]. First Break, 2017, 35(11): 71-74.
    [31]
    Carlson D H, Long A, Söllner W, et al. Increased resolution and penetration from a towed dual-sensor streamer [J]. First Break, 2007, 25(12): 71-77.
    [32]
    Widmaier M, Fromyr E, Dirks V. Dual-sensor towed streamer: from concept to fleet-wide technology platform [J]. First Break, 2015, 33(11): 83-89.
    [33]
    Long A. A bigger picture view of separated wavefields and marine broadband seismic [J]. First Break, 2017, 35(6): 81-86.
    [34]
    Tenghamn R, Vaage S, Borresen C. A dual-sensor, towed marine streamer; Its viable implementation and initial results[C]//2007 SEG Annual Meeting. San Antonio, Texas: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2007: 989-993.
    [35]
    Caprioli P, Özdemir A K, Van Manen D J, et al. Combination of multi-component streamer pressure and vertical particle velocity: theory and application to data[C]//2012 SEG Annual Meeting. Las Vegas, Nevada: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2012.
    [36]
    Tenghamn R, Dhelie P E. GeoStreamer-increasing the signal-to-noise ratio using a dual-sensor towed streamer [J]. First Break, 2009, 27(1305): 45-51.
    [37]
    Ten Kroode F, Bergler S, Corsten C, et al. Broadband seismic data-The importance of low frequencies [J]. Geophysics, 2013, 78(2): WA3-WA14. doi: 10.1190/geo2012-0294.1
    [38]
    Long A, An overview of seismic azimuth for towed streamers[J]. The Leading Edge, 2010, 29(5): 512-523.
    [39]
    Keggin J, Benson M, Rietveld W. Multi-azimuth 3D provides robust improvements in Nile Delta seismic imaging [J]. First Break, 2007, 25(3): 47-54.
    [40]
    Marten R, Rietveld W, Benson M, et al. Utilizing multi-azimuth streamer data for reservoir characterization and uncertainty analysis in the Nile delta[C]//70th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2008. Rome, Italy: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2008.
    [41]
    Cavalin D, Ismail N, Paten T, et al. Broadband seismic and FWI to resolve an incised shallow carbonate platform: Indonesia[C]//SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting. San Antonio, Texas, USA: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2019.
    [42]
    Barkved O, Heavey P, Kommedal J H, et al. Business Impact of Full Waveform Inversion at Valhall[C]//2010 SEG Annual Meeting. Denver, Colorado: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2010: 925-929.
    [43]
    Zou Z, Ramos-Martínez J, Kelly S, et al. Refraction full-waveform inversion in a shallow water environment[C]//76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014. Amsterdam, Netherlands: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2014.
    [44]
    Rønholt G, Korsmo Ø, Brown S, et al. High-fidelity complete wavefield velocity model building and imaging in shallow water environments-A North Sea case study [J]. First Break, 2014, 32(6): 127-131.
    [45]
    Whitmore N D, Valenciano A A, Sollner W, et al. Imaging of primaries and multiples using a dual-sensor towed streamer[C]//2010 SEG Annual Meeting. Denver, Colorado: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2010: 3187-3192.
    [46]
    Lu S, Whitmore D, Valenciano A, et al. Enhanced subsurface illumination from separated wavefield imaging [J]. First Break, 2014, 32(11): 87-92.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]YAN Zhonghui, YANG Rui, FENG Jing, LIU Xinxin, LIU Hong, WANG Xiaojie, JIANG Chuntao. Application of high-resolution small group interval processing technology and attribute analysis for hydrate identification[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2024, 44(6): 46-59. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2024111901
    [2]LUO Di, CAI Feng, YAN Guijing, LI Qing, SUN Yunbao, DONG Gang, LI Ang. High-resolution seismic exploration technology with spark source and its application in identification of natural gas hydrates in marine areas[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2024, 44(6): 34-45. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2024091301
    [3]YU Xichuan, QING Zhiyi, ZHOU Houyun. High resolution climatic and environmental changes in Shandong Peninsula during the last glacial maximum[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2023, 43(6): 103-111. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2023010101
    [4]YAN Zhonghui, FANG Gang, XU Huaning, LIU Jun, SHI Jian, PAN Jun, WANG Jianqiang. The application of Hilbert spectral whitening method to high resolution processing of marine seismic data[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2018, 38(4): 212-220. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2018.04.019
    [5]ZHU Junjiang, LI Sanzhong. PROGRESS OF APPLICATION OF P-CABLE SYSTEM OF 3-D HIGH-RESOLUTION SEISMIC[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2017, 37(4): 221-228. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2017.04.015
    [6]WU Shuyu, LIU Jun. HIGH RESOLUTION SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHIC STUDY BASIC ON TIME-FREQUENCY ANALYSIS[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2015, 35(4): 197-207. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2015.04.021
    [7]WANG Linmiao, LI Guangxue. HIGH-RESOLUTION SEDIMENTARY RECORDS OF THE MUDDY AREA IN THE SOUTH YELLOW SEA AND EAST CHINA SEA: A REVIEW OF NEW PROGRESS[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2014, 34(3): 167-174. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1140.2014.03167
    [8]ZHANG Yulan, JIA Li, LI Zhen, DAI Lu. A HIGH-RESOLUTION PALYNOLOGICAL RECORD AND ITS PALEOENVIRONMENTAL INTERPRETATION IN THE LOW LATITUDE OF SOUTH CHINA SEA SINCE LAST DEGLACIATION[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2011, 31(2): 79-85. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1140.2011.02079
    [9]ZHAO Xing-min, WANG Ji-tang, WU Bi-hao, MA Hui-fu, ZHENG Jun. APPLICATION OF HIGH-RESOLUTION SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY TO PREDICTION OF TERTIARY PETROLEUM GEOLOGICAL ELEMENTS IN EAST CHINA SEA SHELF BASIN[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2007, 27(4): 61-67.
    [10]CAO Li-hua, XU Ji-shang, LI Guang-xue, SHI Jing-hao. HIGH-RESOLUTION MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SAND WAVES OFF THE WEST HAINAN ISLAND[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2006, 26(4): 15-22.

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (999) PDF downloads (31) Cited by()
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Copyright © Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology Editorial Office;   Record No: 鲁ICP备15036216号-7

    Address: 62 Fuzhou South Road, Qingdao City    Post: 266237    Tel: 0532-85755823    E-mail: hydzdsjdz@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. support: info@rhhz.net Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return