南黄海盆地中、古生界地质特征及勘探方向

张敏强, 高顺莉, 谭思哲

张敏强, 高顺莉, 谭思哲. 南黄海盆地中、古生界地质特征及勘探方向[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2018, 38(3): 24-34. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2018.03.002
引用本文: 张敏强, 高顺莉, 谭思哲. 南黄海盆地中、古生界地质特征及勘探方向[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2018, 38(3): 24-34. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2018.03.002
ZHANG Minqiang, GAO Shunli, TAN Sizhe. Geological characteristics of the Meso-Paleozoic in South Yellow Sea Basin and future exploration[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2018, 38(3): 24-34. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2018.03.002
Citation: ZHANG Minqiang, GAO Shunli, TAN Sizhe. Geological characteristics of the Meso-Paleozoic in South Yellow Sea Basin and future exploration[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2018, 38(3): 24-34. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2018.03.002

南黄海盆地中、古生界地质特征及勘探方向

基金项目: 

中海石油(中国)有限公司项目“南黄海盆地中部隆起古地理重建及成藏主控因素研究” YXKY-2018-SH-01

国家科技重大专项“近海中、古生界残留盆地特征及油气潜力” 2011ZX05023-003

详细信息
    作者简介:

    张敏强(1958—), 男,教授级高级工程师,主要从事海洋油气勘探工作,E-mail:zhangmq@cnooc.com.cn

  • 中图分类号: TE122.1

Geological characteristics of the Meso-Paleozoic in South Yellow Sea Basin and future exploration

  • 摘要: 南黄海广泛发育海相中、古生界,资源量丰富,勘探潜力大,但一直未取得勘探突破。通过与上扬子四川盆地类比,最大的差异在于后期构造改造的强度不同。南黄海盆地遭受多期次强烈的后期改造,致使早期生成的油气被破坏和改造,不利于油气保存,在南黄海区内寻找构造相对稳定的区带,是南黄海盆地中、古生界取得油气突破的关键;综合南黄海残留地层分布、石油地质条件、构造变形特征等的研究结果,对南黄海中、古生界最具现实勘探意义的区域进行了优选,认为崂山隆起中南部弱变形区是南黄海中、古生界实现勘探突破最有利区带,下古生界是下一步重点的勘探层系。
    Abstract: The South Yellow Sea Basin is a large Mesozoic-Paleozoic petroliferous basin with substantial hydrocarbon potential. However, there has had no breakthrough so far in oil exploration in the basin. Comparison suggests that the biggest difference between the South Yellow Sea Basin and the Sichun Basin is mainly caused by tectonic intensity. It is known that the South Yellow Sea Basin has suffered from multi stages of tectonic movement in the periods of Mesozoic and Palaeozoic and the preservation conditions are damaged to certain extent. Breakthrough in oil and gas exploration is expected in some tectonically stable zones. Based on the above observation, this paper is devoted to the tectonic- sedimentary evolution as well as the stratigraphic distribution of South Yellow Sea Basin, following the evaluation of petroleum geological conditions. Some target areas with weak deformation in middle-south area of Laoshan uplift are identified and the lower Paleozoic is selected as the key exploration strata. Some target areas such as the middle and south Laoshan uplift where deformation is relatively weak are recommended for future exploration.
  • 图  1   南黄海盆地构造区划图

    Figure  1.   Tectonic map of South Yellow Sea basin

    图  2   南黄海区早寒武世沉积相图

    Figure  2.   Sedimentary facies map of Early Cambrian in South Yellow Sea area

    图  3   南黄海区晚志留世沉积相图

    Figure  3.   Sedimentary facies map of Late Silurian in South Yellow Sea area

    图  4   南黄海区早二叠世沉积相图

    Figure  4.   Sedimentary facies map of Early Permian in South Yellow Sea area

    图  5   南黄海区晚二叠世沉积相图

    Figure  5.   Sedimentary facies map of Late Permian in South Yellow Sea area

    图  6   南黄海盆地残留地层总体分布特征

    Figure  6.   Distribution pattern of residual strata in South Yellow Sea area

    图  7   南黄海地区印支面构造图

    Figure  7.   Structural map of Indosinian surface of South Yellow Sea area

    图  8   南黄海地区加里东面构造图

    Figure  8.   Structural map of Caledonian surface of South Yellow Sea area

    图  9   下扬子地区碎屑岩储集空间镜下特征

    a长石石英砂岩,颗粒间溶蚀孔隙,二叠系龙潭组,巢湖地区。单偏光,×40;b石英砂岩,溶蚀缝。泥盆系五通组,南京周边地区。单偏光,×40

    Figure  9.   Characteristics of the reservoir space in clastic rocks in Lower Yangtze areas

    图  10   南黄海中、古生界储盖组合特征

    Figure  10.   Mesozoic and Paleozoic reservoir and cap assemblages in South Yellow Sea

    图  11   崂山隆起地震资料品质评价

    Figure  11.   Assessment map of seismic data quality on Laoshan uplift

    图  12   印支末期崂山隆起构造分区

    Figure  12.   Tectonic division of Laoshan uplift at late Indo-sinian epoch

    表  1   下扬子和南黄海地区烃源岩地化特征综合对比

    Table  1   Comparison of the geochemical characteristics of source rocks between Lower Yangtze and South Yellow Sea areas

    层位 沉积环境 主要岩石类型 主要生物 氧化还原条件 整体均值/(TOC%) 有机质类型 有机质成熟度 厚度/
    m
    下扬子 南黄海
    1 盆地 泥/页岩 蓝绿藻、绿藻 厌氧 4.22 无资料 高—过成熟 50~300
    O3w~S1l 陆棚 页岩、泥岩 放射虫、海绵骨针、硅藻、笔石 准厌氧—厌氧 1.28 高成熟 40~80
    P1q 缓坡 碳酸盐岩 裸海松藻、筳、介形虫、腕足、珊瑚等 贫氧—厌氧 1.32 1.21 成熟—高成熟 24~77
    P2l 沼泽 泥岩/煤 头足、腕足、瓣腮、植屑 常氧 2.1 1.57 234~252
    P2d 陆棚 泥岩 放射虫、菊石、海绵骨针 厌氧 1.8 1.75 45~80
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 王大鹏, 白国平, 徐艳, 等.全球古生界海相碳酸盐岩大油气田特征及油气分布[J].古地理学报, 2016, 18(1): 80-92. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gdlxb201601006

    WANG Dapeng, BAI Guoping, XU Yan, et al. Characteristics and hydrocarbon distribution of the Paleozoic giant marine carbonate rock oil-gas fields in the world[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2016, 18(1): 80-92. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gdlxb201601006

    [2] 贾东, 武龙, 闰兵, 等.全球大型油气田的盆地类型与分布规律[J].高校地质学报, 2011, 17(2): 170-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2011.02.003

    JIA Dong, WU Long, YAN Bing, et al. Basin types and distribution of the global giant oil and gas fields[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2011, 17(2): 170-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2011.02.003

    [3] 江怀友, 宋新民, 王元基, 等.世界海相碳酸盐岩油气勘探开发现状与展望[J].海洋石油, 2008, 28(4): 6-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2008.04.002

    JIANG Huaiyou, SONG Xinming, WANG Yuanji, et al. Current situation and forecast of the world's carbonate oil and gas exploration and development[J]. Offshore Oil, 2008, 28(4): 6-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2008.04.002

    [4] 金之钧.中国海相碳酸盐岩层系油气勘探特殊性问题[J].地学前缘, 2005, 12(3): 15-22. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2005.03.003

    JIN Zhijun. Particularity of petroleum exploration on marine carbonate strata in China sedimentary basins[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2005, 12(3): 15-22. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2005.03.003

    [5] 张水昌, 梁狄刚, 朱光有, 等.中国海相油气田形成的地质基础[J].中国科学通报, 2007, 52(S1): 19-31. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-KXTB2007S1003.htm

    ZHANG Shuichang, LIANG Digang, ZHU Guangyou, et al. Fundamental geological elements for the occurrence of Chinese marine oil and gas accumulations[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, 52(S1): 28-43. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-KXTB2007S1003.htm

    [6] 马新华.四川盆地天然气发展进入黄金时代[J].天然气工业, 2017, 37(2): 1-10. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqgy201702001

    MA Xinhua. A golden era for natural gas development in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37(2): 1-10. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqgy201702001

    [7] 安蓓.四川盆地安岳气田龙王庙组将建成年产110亿方天然气产能[N].新华网, 2014-03-24.

    An Bei. The gas reservoir of Longwangmiao formation in Anyue gas field in the Sichuan basin will produce 11 billion party natural gas production capacity[N]. Xinhuanet, 2014-03-24.

    [8] 高顺莉, 徐发.浅海区古生界海底电缆拟宽线地震采集方法[J].地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(5): 2382-2387. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DQWJ201405058.htm

    GAO Shunli, XU Fa. OBC pseud wide line acquisition method for Paleozoic in shallow sea area[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(5): 2382-2387. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DQWJ201405058.htm

    [9] 高顺莉, 张敏强, 陈华.大震源长缆深沉放地震采集技术在南黄海中古生代盆地的应用[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2014, 34(1): 95-101. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-HYDZ201401015.htm

    GAO Shunli, ZHANG Minqiang, CHEN Hua. A large-scale seismic source, deep gun and cable sinking and long cable pength application in Mesozoic-Paleozoic basin in the South Huanghai Sea[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2014, 34(1): 95-101. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-HYDZ201401015.htm

    [10] 徐旭辉, 周小进, 彭金宁, 等.从扬子地区海相盆地演化改造与成藏浅析南黄海勘探方向[J].石油实验地质, 2014, 36(5): 523-531, 545. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sysydz201405002

    XU Xuhui, ZHOU Xiaojing, PENG Jinyu, et al. Exploration targets in Southern Yellow Sea through analysis of tectono-depositional evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation of marine basin in Yangtze area[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014, 36(5): 523-531, 545. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sysydz201405002

    [11] 中国石油(中国)有限公司上海分公司.下扬子西部区块页岩气勘探项目2015年度研究报告(内部报告), 2015.

    CNOOC (Chinese) Co. Ltd. Shanghai Branch. The 2015 Annual Report the West Block of Shale Gas Exploration Project (internal report), 2015.

    [12] 王庭斌.天然气与石油成藏条件差异及中国气田成藏模式[J].天然气地球科学, 2003, 14(2): 79-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1926.2003.02.001

    WANG Tingbin. Differences in reservoiring conditions of oil and natural gas and reservoiring models of gas fields in China[J]. Nature Gas Geoscience, 2003, 14(2): 79-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1926.2003.02.001

    [13] 赵宗举, 朱琰, 李大成.中国南方中、古生界古今油气藏形成演化控制因素及勘探方向[J].天然气工业, 2002, 22(5): 1-6. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2002.05.001

    ZHAO Zongju, ZHU Yan, LI Dacheng. Factors controlling the formation and evolution of Mesozoic and Paleozoic oil/gas reservoirs and their exploration targets in South China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2002, 22(5): 1-6. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2002.05.001

    [14] 郭飞飞, 康建云, 孙建峰, 等.江汉盆地构造演化与海相地层油气成藏模式[J].岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 23-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2010.01.005

    GUO Feifei, KANG Jianyun, SUN Jianfeng, et al. Tectonic evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation model for marine strata in Jianghan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(1): 23-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2010.01.005

    [15] 窦立荣, 王红军, 祁连爽, 等.中国古生界海相油气成藏模式划分及其意义[J].江汉石油学院学报, 2004, 26(2): 41-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2004.02.015

    DOU Lirong, WANG Hongjun, QI Lianshuang, et al. Reservoir forming mode clasification and significance of Palaeozoic marine oil and gas in China[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2004, 26(2): 41-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2004.02.015

    [16] 马永生, 陈洪德, 王国力, 等.中国南方层序地层与古地理[M].北京:科学出版社, 2009: 561-591.

    MA Yongsheng, CHEN Hongde, WANG Guoli, et al. Sequence Stratigraphy and Palaeogeography in Southern China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009: 561-591.

    [17] 陈洪德, 倪新锋, 刘文均, 等.中国南方盆地覆盖类型及油气成藏[J].石油学报, 2008, 29(3): 317-323. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2008.03.001

    CHEN Hongde, NI Xinfeng, LIU Wenjun, et al. Overlay relationship of basins and hydrocarbon accumulation in South China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2008, 29(3): 317-323. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2008.03.001

    [18] 戴少武, 贺自爱, 王津义.中国南方中、古生界油气勘探的思路[J].石油与天然气地质, 2001, 22(3): 195-202, 209. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2001.03.001

    DAI Shaowu, HE Zi'ai, WANG Jinyi. Thinking of Meso-Paleozoic hydrocarbon exploration in South China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2001, 22(3): 195-202, 209. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2001.03.001

    [19] 蔡峰, 熊斌辉.南黄海海域与下扬子地区海相中-古生界地层对比及烃源岩评价[J].海洋地质动态, 2007, 23(6): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2722.2007.06.001

    CAI Feng, XIONG Binhui. Comparison of marine Mesozoic-Paleozoic strata and hydrocarbon source rocks in the South Yellow Sea and Lower Yangtze area[J]. Marine Geology Letters, 2007, 23(6): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2722.2007.06.001

    [20] 李刚, 陈建文, 肖国林, 等.南黄海海域的海相中-古生界油气远景[J].海洋地质动态, 2003, 19(8): 12-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2722.2003.08.004

    LI Gang, CHEN Jianwen, XIAO Guolin, et al. Petroleum prospect of marine Paleozoic in the South Yellow Sea[J]. Marine Geology Letters, 2003, 19(8): 12-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2722.2003.08.004

    [21] 谭思哲, 高顺莉, 葛和平, 等.南黄海盆地二叠系烃源岩孢粉相特征及其形成环境[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2015, 45(3): 691-700. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cckjdxxb201503004

    TAN Sizhe, GAO Shunli, Ge Heping, et al. Palynofacies characteristics and formation environment of Permian source rock in South Yellow Sea Basin[J].Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2015, 45(3): 691-700. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cckjdxxb201503004

    [22] 陈建文, 龚建明, 李刚, 等.南黄海盆地海相中-古生界油气资源潜力巨大[J].海洋地质前沿, 2016, 32(1): 1-7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-HYDT201601001.htm

    CHEN Jianwen, GONG Jianming, LI Gang, et al. Great resources potential of the marine Mesozoic-Paleozoic in the South Yellow Sea Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2016, 32(1): 1-7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-HYDT201601001.htm

图(12)  /  表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2661
  • HTML全文浏览量:  385
  • PDF下载量:  4
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-01-18
  • 修回日期:  2018-02-27
  • 刊出日期:  2018-06-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回