WANG Meng, LIU Zhijie, YANG Yuqing, ZHANG Zhiqiang. Characteristics and classification of the Paleogene reservoirs in Huagang Formation of Gas Field N, East China Sea Basin[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2021, 41(2): 166-172. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2020061203
Citation: WANG Meng, LIU Zhijie, YANG Yuqing, ZHANG Zhiqiang. Characteristics and classification of the Paleogene reservoirs in Huagang Formation of Gas Field N, East China Sea Basin[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2021, 41(2): 166-172. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2020061203

Characteristics and classification of the Paleogene reservoirs in Huagang Formation of Gas Field N, East China Sea Basin

More Information
  • Received Date: June 11, 2020
  • Revised Date: July 26, 2020
  • Available Online: April 07, 2021
  • The Paleogene Huagang Formation in the N gas field of Xihu Sag in the East China Sea Basin is a typical tight reservoir of low-porosity and low-permeability. Based on a large number of testing data for core property, particle size, thin section and mercury testing, the lithology, physical properties and pore structures of the reservoirs in the gas field N are carefully studied in this paper. The Huagang Formation is dominated by fine quartz sandstone with little clay. With the increase in burial depth, the intergranular pores decrease, the dissolution pores increase, and the porosity becomes worse in general, as the pore throat diameter is reduced and the connectivity deteriorated. Glutenite sometimes occurs locally, the permeability of which is more than one order higher than that of the fine sandstone, and thus becomes sweet areas for oil production. Based on the statistical results of testing data, a comprehensive evaluation standard specially applicable to the Huagang reservoir is established, which contains four important reservoir parameters, namely porosity, permeability, saturation and geological features. The classification results are distinctive and reliable. Facts prove that it is an effective tool for exploration and development of tight low-porosity and low-permeability reservoirs in the region.
  • [1]
    邹才能, 张国生, 杨智, 等. 非常规油气概念、特征、潜力及技术——兼论非常规油气地质学[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(4):385-399, 454. [ZOU Caineng, ZHANG Guosheng, YANG Zhi, et al. Geological concepts, characteristics, resource potential and key techniques of unconventional hydrocarbon: On unconventional petroleum geology [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(4): 385-399, 454. doi: 10.11698/PED.2013.04.01
    [2]
    贾承造. 论非常规油气对经典石油天然气地质学理论的突破及意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1):1-11. [JIA Chengzao. Breakthrough and significance of unconventional oil and gas to classical petroleum geological theory [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 1-11. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(17)30002-2
    [3]
    陶士振, 邹才能. 东海盆地西湖凹陷天然气成藏及分布规律[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2005, 32(4):103-110. [TAO Shizhen, ZOU Caineng. Accumulation and distribution of natural gases in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2005, 32(4): 103-110. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2005.04.017
    [4]
    曾大乾, 李淑贞. 中国低渗透砂岩储层类型及地质特征[J]. 石油学报, 1994, 15(1):38-46. [ZENG Daqian, LI Shuzhen. Types and characteristics of low permeability sandstone reservoirs in China [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1994, 15(1): 38-46. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.1994.01.014
    [5]
    王会丽. 金湖凹陷低孔低渗储层分布与测井评价方法研究[D]. 中国石油大学硕士学位论文, 2011.

    WANG Huili. Study on distribution and logging evaluation methods of low porosity and permeability reservoirs in Jinhu depression[D]. Master Dissertation of China University of Petroleum, 2011.
    [6]
    杨玉卿, 潘福熙, 田洪, 等. 渤中25-1油田沙河街组低孔低渗储层特征及分类评价[J]. 现代地质, 2010, 24(4):685-693. [YANG Yuqing, PAN Fuxi, TIAN Hong, et al. Characteristics and classification and evaluation of low porosity and permeability reservoir in Shahejie formation of BZ25-1 oilfield [J]. Geoscience, 2010, 24(4): 685-693. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2010.04.006
    [7]
    赵靖舟, 吴少波, 武富礼. 论低渗透储层的分类与评价标准——以鄂尔多斯盆地为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3):28-31, 53. [ZHAO Jingzhou, WU Shaobo, WU Fuli. The classification and evaluation criterion of low permeability reservoir: An example from Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 28-31, 53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2007.03.005
    [8]
    姜艳娇, 孙建孟, 高建申, 等. X区块低孔渗气藏储层特征及分类评价研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(10):164-172. [JIANG Yanjiao, SUN Jianmeng, GAO Jianshen, et al. Study on reservoir characteristics and classification evaluation in low porosity and low permeability gas reservoir of X block [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(10): 164-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2017.10.028
    [9]
    刘金水, 廖宗廷, 贾健谊, 等. 东海陆架盆地地质结构及构造演化[J]. 上海地质, 2003, 23(3):1-6. [LIU Jinshui, LIAO Zongting, JIA Jianyi, et al. The geological structure and tectonic evolution of the East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Shanghai Geology, 2003, 23(3): 1-6.
    [10]
    蒋一鸣, 邵龙义, 李帅, 等. 西湖凹陷平湖构造带平湖组沉积体系及层序地层研究[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(1):141-153. [JIANG Yiming, SHAO Longyi, LI Shuai, et al. Deposition system and stratigraphy of Pinghu formation in Pinghu tectonic belt, Xihu Sag [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(1): 141-153.
    [11]
    姜亮. 东海陆架盆地油气资源勘探现状及含油气远景[J]. 中国海上油气(地质), 2003, 17(1):1-5. [JIANG Liang. Exploration status and perspective of petroleum resources in East China Sea shelf basin [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas (Geology), 2003, 17(1): 1-5.
    [12]
    李上卿, 李纯洁. 东海西湖凹陷油气资源分布及勘探潜力分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2003, 25(6):721-728. [LI Shangqing, LI Chunjie. Analysis on the petroleum resource distribution and exploration potential of the Xihu depression, the East China Sea [J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2003, 25(6): 721-728. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2003.06.015
    [13]
    陈志勇, 葛和平. 西湖凹陷反转构造与油气聚集[J]. 中国海上油气(地质), 2003, 17(1):20-24. [CHEN Zhiyong, GE Heping. Inversion structures and hydrocarbon accumulation in XIHU sag, east China Sea basin [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas (Geology), 2003, 17(1): 20-24.
    [14]
    顾惠荣, 贾健谊, 叶加仁. 东海西湖凹陷含油气系统特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(3):295-297, 306. [GU Huirong, JIA Jianyi, YE Jiaren. Characteristics of oil and gas bearing system in Xihu lake depression in the East China Sea [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2002, 23(3): 295-297, 306. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2002.03.021
    [15]
    祝建军, 王琪, 梁建设, 等. 东海陆架盆地南部新生代地质结构与构造演化特征研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(2):222-229. [ZHU Jianjun, WANG Qi, LIANG Jianshe, et al. Cenozoic geological structure and tectonic evolution of southern East China Sea shelf basin [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(2): 222-229.
    [16]
    张武, 徐发, 徐国盛, 等. 西湖凹陷某构造花港组致密砂岩储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J]. 成都理工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 39(2):122-129. [ZHANG Wu, XU Fa, XU Guosheng, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of Huagang Formation tight sandstone reservoirs in a structure of Xihu depression in East China Sea Basin [J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology: Science & Technology Edition, 2012, 39(2): 122-129.
    [17]
    刘金水, 曹冰, 徐志星, 等. 西湖凹陷某构造花港组沉积相及致密砂岩储层特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 39(2):130-136. [LIU Jinshui, CAO Bing, XU Zhixing, et al. Sedimentary facies and the characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs of Huagang Formation in Xihu depression, East China Sea Basin [J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology: Science & Technology Edition, 2012, 39(2): 130-136.
    [18]
    张建培, 徐发, 钟韬, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平湖组-花港组层序地层模式及沉积演化[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2012, 32(1):35-41. [ZHANG Jianpei, XU Fa, ZHONG Tao, et al. Sequence stratigraphic models and sedimentary evolution of Pinghu and Huagang formations in Xihu trough [J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2012, 32(1): 35-41.
    [19]
    胡明毅, 柯岭, 梁建设. 西湖凹陷花港组沉积相特征及相模式[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2010, 32(5):1-5. [HU Mingyi, KE Ling, LIANG Jianshe. The characteristics and pattern of sedimentary facies of Huagang formation in Xihu depression [J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2010, 32(5): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2010.05.001
    [20]
    王果寿, 周卓明, 肖朝辉, 等. 西湖凹陷春晓区带下第三系平湖组、花港组沉积特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(3):257-261, 265. [WANG Guoshou, ZHOU Zhuoming, XIAO Chaohui, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Eogene Pinghu formation and Huagang formation in Chunxiao zone of Xihu Lake depression [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2002, 23(3): 257-261, 265. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2002.03.012
    [21]
    中华人民共和国国土资源部. DZ/T 0252-2013 海上石油天然气储量计算规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013.

    Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China. DZ/T 0252-2013 Regulation of offshore petroleum reserves estimation[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2013.
    [22]
    国家能源局. SY/T 6832-2011 致密砂岩气地质评价方法[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2011.

    National Energy Administration. SY/T 6832-2011 Geological evaluating methods for tight sandstone gas[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2011.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIAO Jihua, ZHANG Xiaoqing, SU Shengmin, WANG Ke, GENG Mingyang, LI Linzhi. Tectonic migration and its impact on the development of source rocks in the Paleogene Lishui Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2025, 45(2): 146-157. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2024090301
    [2]CHEN Chunfeng, CHEN Zhongyun, WAN Yanzhou, CHEN Jianwen, XU Donghao, FENG Zhenming, YU Weizhe, JIANG Xue. Shallow meandering river delta in the Huagang Formation in the southern Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2024, 44(6): 175-185. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2024040801
    [3]LI Jianping, XU Wei, YAN Zhuoyu, ZHANG Cheng, XIONG Lianqiao. Controlling factors on the effectiveness of turbidite fan reservoir of the Meishan Formation, Qiongdongnan Basin[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2023, 43(3): 157-166. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2022090602
    [4]JIANG Xue, XIONG Zhiwu. Semi-quantitative study on reservoir configuration in grey theory—A case study of H3 sand unit of Huagang Formation in A Structure, Xihu Sag[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2022, 42(6): 162-172. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2022022301
    [5]LIU Feng, HUANG Suwei, YANG Pengcheng, ZHANG Chuanyun. Characteristics of gas reservoir and controlling factors for gas accumulation in the Huagang Formation in Y Structure, Xihu Sag[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2021, 41(6): 174-182. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2021080401
    [6]XU Bo. Geochemistry and genesis of the formation water in Huagang Formation of the Tiantai Inversion Zone, the Xihu Depression of the East China Sea Basin[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2021, 41(3): 62-71. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2020122101
    [7]LI Kun, ZHANG Pei, ZHANG Ping, LI Qian, WAN Lifen, XI Minhong. Analysis of reservoir-forming conditions and key controlling factors of Huagang Formation in the central anticlinal belt of Xihu Sag of East China Sea—Taking the reservoir H3 for example[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2020, 40(5): 127-135. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2019070408
    [8]CAI Jia, QI Peng, SONG Shuang. SEDIMENTARY FACIES OF THE LOWER HUAGANG FORMATION IN XIHU DEPRESSION OF DONGHAI BASIN[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2017, 37(2): 56-65. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2017.02.006
    [9]ZHANG Jianpei, XU Fa, ZHONG Tao, ZHANG Tian, YU Yifan. SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHIC MODELS AND SEDIMENTARY EVOLUTION OF PINGHU AND HUAGANG FORMATIONS IN XIHU TROUGH[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2012, 32(1): 35-41. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1140.2012.01035
    [10]CHEN Qing-hua, PANG Fei, QU Dong-fang. DEPOSITIONAL AND RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CRETACEOUS CHISHAN FORMATION IN SUBEI BASIN AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2008, 28(6): 95-100. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1140.2008.06095

Catalog

    Article views (1600) PDF downloads (20) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return