LUO Jian, HU Wengliang, HE Yuchun, LIU Chunfeng, WANG Meng. Logging evaluation for low permeability reservoirs under different mud systems in East China Sea[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2019, 39(6): 216-227. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2019070403
Citation: LUO Jian, HU Wengliang, HE Yuchun, LIU Chunfeng, WANG Meng. Logging evaluation for low permeability reservoirs under different mud systems in East China Sea[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2019, 39(6): 216-227. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2019070403

Logging evaluation for low permeability reservoirs under different mud systems in East China Sea

More Information
  • Received Date: July 03, 2019
  • Revised Date: September 23, 2019
  • Available Online: December 23, 2019
  • The East China Sea has rich oil and gas resources, in which the low porosity and low permeability reservoirs account for two-thirds of the total and hence are of great importance for exploration. It is occasionally found during exploration that some of the reservoirs have good physical properties, but low production. Efforts have been made to find out the reasons for such a phenomenon and the ways to improve the productivity. Our study found that water-based mud has irreversible pollution to the oil and gas reservoir, and thus oil-based mud is recommended. In the new mud system, the environment for well logging and mud logging are opposite. In the environment of oil-based mud, the invasion phenomenon is completely different for oil-gas reservoir and water reservoir. For oil and gas reservoirs, there is no mud invasion. For water reservoirs, however, mud invasion is common. Besides, the mud environment has great impact on the component of gas logging and fluorescence data. Some of the components may be absorbed by oil based mud and the fluorescence disturbed. In conclusion, the influence of oil based mud can not be ignored, when identification and quantitative evaluation are made for oil, gas and water reservoirs. By comparing some well logging and mud logging interpretation methods in different mud environment, we have established in this paper a fast and effective method for identification of oil and gas reservoirs in the East China Sea.
  • [1]
    张海山. 东海地区低孔低渗储层低自由水钻井液体系研究与应用[J]. 中国海上油气, 2013, 25(2):71-72. [ZHANG Haishan. The research and application of low free water drilling fluid system in the low porosity and low permeability reservoirs in the East China Sea [J]. China offshore Oil and Gas, 2013, 25(2): 71-72.
    [2]
    朱胜. 油基钻井液体系在东海气田的试验应用[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2017, 34(1):77-82. [ZHU Sheng. Application of oil base drilling fluids in Donghai gas field [J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2017, 34(1): 77-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2017.01.014
    [3]
    张兴来. 一种钻井液滤液侵入储层深度的评价方法[J]. 广东化工, 2018, 45(9):41-42, 52. [ZHANG Xinglai. The evaluation method for the invasion depth of the filtrate of drilling fluids [J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2018, 45(9): 41-42, 52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1865.2018.09.018
    [4]
    鄢捷年. 钻井液工艺学[M]. 东营: 中国石油大学出版社, 2001: 5-6.

    YANG Jienian. Drilling Fluid Technology[M]. Dongying: China University of Petroleum Press, 2001: 5-6.
    [5]
    张勇, 郑学磊, 裴小彬, 等. 油基钻井液组成介绍及维护要点[J]. 石化技术, 2018, 25(12):208. [ZHANG Yong, ZHENG Xuelei, PEI Xiaobin, et al. Oil-based drilling fluid composition introduction and maintenance points [J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2018, 25(12): 208. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0235.2018.12.157
    [6]
    李秀彬, 马树明, 罗刚, 等. 录井技术在霍101井油基钻井液条件下的运用[J]. 新疆石油科技, 2016(2):27-31. [LI Xiubin, MA Shuming, LUO Gang, et al. Application of logging technology in the oil-based drilling fluid of Huo 101 well [J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Science & Technology, 2016(2): 27-31.
    [7]
    黄隆基. 放射性测井原理[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1985: 136-227.

    HUANG Longji. Radioactive Logging Principle[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2001: 136-227.
    [8]
    张泉滢, 张锋, 王玉伟, 等. 随钻中子伽马密度测井的双源距含氢指数校正方法[J]. 中国石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2017, 41(4):78-84. [ZHANG Quanying, ZHANG Feng, WANC Yuwei, et al. Dual-spacing hydrogen index correction method for neutron gamma density measuring in LWD [J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum: Edition of Natural Science, 2017, 41(4): 78-84.
    [9]
    于华伟, 杨锦州, 张锋. 随钻D-T中子孔隙度测井低灵敏度和岩性影响校正方法研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2014, 38(3):45-49. [YU Huawei, YANG Jinzhou, ZHANG Feng. Correction method of low sensitivity and lithology effect of D-T neutron porosity logging-while-drilling [J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum: Edition of Natural Science, 2014, 38(3): 45-49.
    [10]
    王中良. 海上低孔渗储层电缆地层测试评价方法研究[D]. 东北石油大学硕士学位论文, 2011.

    WANG Zhongliang. Study on evaluation methods of Wireline formation test data in offshore low porosity and permeability reservoirs[D]. Master Dissertation of Northeast Petroleum University, 2011.
    [11]
    周建立, 谢俊. 油基钻井液对气测值的影响与校正处理[J]. 录井工程, 2014, 25(2):22-26. [ZHOU Jianli, XIE Jun. Impacts of oil-based drilling fluids on gas logging data and its correction [J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2014, 25(2): 22-26.
    [12]
    李胜, 夏柏如, 韩秀贞, 等. 油水比对油基钻井液性能的影响研究[J]. 油田化学, 2017, 34(2):196-200. [LI Sheng, XIA Bairu, HAN Xiuzhen, et al. Effects of oil-water ratio on performance of oil-based drilling fluid [J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2017, 34(2): 196-200.
    [13]
    段晓东, 王文强, 张娟, 等. 油基钻井液的探讨与分析[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2015, 27(12):82-84. [DUAN Xiaodong, WANG Wenqiang, ZHANG Juan, et al. Discussion and analysis of oil-based drilling fluid [J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2015, 27(12): 82-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5716.2015.12.027
    [14]
    陈俊男. 三维定量荧光录井技术应用探讨[J]. 录井工程, 2015, 16(2):5-10. [CHEN Junnan. The application of 3D quantitative fluorescence logging technology [J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2015, 16(2): 5-10.
    [15]
    刘新, 蔡军, 李娟, 等. 三维定量荧光MS指数在冀中勘探重点区带的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2019, 30(1):27-32. [LIU Xin, CAI Jun, LI Juan, et al. Application of three-dimensional quantitative fluorescence MS index to Jizhong key exploration zones [J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2019, 30(1): 27-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2019.01.006
    [16]
    倪朋勃. 三维定量荧光技术在渤中坳陷油层识别中的应用研究[D]. 东北石油大学硕士学位论文, 2017: 2.

    NI Pengbo. QFA Application research the reservoir Identification in Bozhong Depression[D]. Master Dissertation of Northeast Petroleum University, 2017: 2.
    [17]
    刘堂晏, 吕洪志, 王绍民, 等. 用MDT压降流度计算地层渗透率的新方法[J]. 中国海上油气(地质), 2003, 17(3):211-214. [LIU Tangyan, LÜ Hongzhi, WANG Shaomin, et al. New calculating methods of formation permeability from MDT mobility [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas (Geology), 2003, 17(3): 211-214.
    [18]
    袁云福, 高楚桥. 利用MDT和NMR资料确定储层产能预测参数[J]. 江汉石油学院学报, 2004, 26(S1):68-69. [YUAN Yunfu, GAO Chuqiao. Determining productivity prediction parameters with MDT and NMR date [J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2004, 26(S1): 68-69.
    [19]
    鄢捷年, 赵雄虎. 高温高压下油基钻井液的流变特性[J]. 石油学报, 2003, 24(3):104-109. [YAN Jienian, ZHAO Xionghu. Rheological properties of oil-based drilling fluids at high temperature and high pressure [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2003, 24(3): 104-109. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2003.03.023
    [20]
    伍友佳, 蔡正旗. 油藏地质学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2007: 5-25.

    WU Youjia, CAI Zhengqi. Reservoir Geology[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2007: 5-25.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 陆凯,孙军,李广雪,杨慧良,王忠蕾,梅西,陈晓辉,祁江豪,朱晓青,强小科. 南黄海SYS90-1A孔第四纪沉积物磁性地层学研究. 海洋地质与第四纪地质. 2024(02): 97-109 . 本站查看
    2. 郝义,种衍飞,冯英明,张昊,臧浩,杨帆,李广雪. 日照近岸海域晚更新世以来地层结构及沉积环境演化. 海洋科学. 2022(08): 15-31 .
    3. 王中波,张江勇,梅西,陈晓辉,赵利,张勇,张志珣,李学杰,李日辉,陆凯,孙荣涛,杨守业. 中国陆架海MIS5(74~128 ka)以来地层及其沉积环境. 中国地质. 2020(05): 1370-1394 .
    4. 何梦颖,梅西,张训华,刘健,郭兴伟,郑洪波. 南黄海陆架区CSDP-1孔沉积物碎屑锆石U-Pb年龄物源判别. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版). 2019(01): 85-95 .
    5. 王辉,夏非,张永战,高抒,李家彪. 江苏中部海岸西洋潮流通道区域晚更新世古地貌与沉积体系研究. 海洋学报. 2019(03): 134-142 .
    6. 吴振,李岩,王松涛,印萍,刘金庆. 威海市近海海域浅地层结构及灾害地质特征. 山东国土资源. 2018(09): 42-48 .
    7. KONG Xianghuai,ZHANG Junqiang,BAI Weiming,LIU Jian. Provenance of Sediments Filling a Paleo-Channel that Formed on the Western Yellow Sea Continental Shelf During the Last Glacial Period. Journal of Ocean University of China. 2018(06): 1309-1317 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article views (3127) PDF downloads (23) Cited by(13)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return