Numerical simulation of Mesozoic hydrocarbon generation, migration and accumulation in the southern East China Sea
-
摘要: 综合分析和盆地的生烃、排烃、运移和聚集仿真数值模拟表明，东海南部中生界发育T3-J2和K12-K2两套生烃潜力大致相当的暗色泥岩烃源岩，总生烃量达1.2×1011 t。J1-2暗色泥岩是经“油—源”对比证实的成熟有效烃源岩，K12-K2暗色泥岩是潜在烃源岩。T3-J2烃源岩生成的烃类运移聚集始于早白垩世早期，晚白垩世达到高峰；K12-K2烃源岩生成的烃类运移聚集始于晚白垩世末期，古新世末达到高峰；雁荡运动和瓯江运动及其之前形成的各类圈闭，更有利于捕获和聚集侏罗系和白垩系烃源岩生成和排出的烃类。中—新生代的多期构造运动形成的断裂和不整合面为烃类运移提供了重要优势通道，烃类多沿断裂带及附近的构造圈闭聚集。白垩系内的烃类聚集量是侏罗系的3倍，白垩系内的“构造型”和J2/K1之间不整合面附近的“构造—地层不整合复合型”是本区中生界两类重要的油气聚集，聚集模式可能包括“近源聚集”和“远源聚集”2种，成藏组合包括“自生自储自盖”、“下生上储上盖”和“新生古储新盖”3种。Abstract: Comprehensive analysis and numerical simulation are conducted for hydrocarbon generation, expulsion, migration and accumulation in the southern East China Sea. Results show that the dark mudstones in the T3-J2 and K12-K2 have similar hydrocarbon generation potential roughly in an amount of 1.2×1011 t. The dark mudstone developed in J1-2 has been proved a mature and effective source rock by oil and source rock correlation, whereas the dark mudstone deposited in the K12-K2 is also a potential source rock of the study area. The hydrocarbons generated by T3-J2 source rocks started migration and accumulation in Early Cretaceous and peaked in Late Cretaceous, while the hydrocarbons generated by K12-K2 source rocks started moving in Late Cretaceous and reached its peak in Late Paleocene. Traps formed by the Yandang movement, the Oujiang movement and the movements before them were favorable for capturing the hydrocarbons coming from the Jurassic and Cretaceous source rocks. Faults and unconformities formed by the Mesozoic-Cenozoic multi-stage tectonic movements provided prevailed paths for hydrocarbon to move and accumulate in the structural traps in the fault-zone in preferential position. The hydrocarbon accumulation in the Cretaceous is estimated three times more than that in the Jurassic. The structural type and the joint structural-unconformity type of accumulations near the unconformity surface between J2 and K1 is two important types of hydrocarbon accumulation in the Mesozoic. Two accumulation models i.e. the "near-source accumulation" and the "far-source accumulation", are discovered. There are three types of hydrocarbon accumulations: the accumulation synchronously generated, stored and sealed; the accumulation early generated, later stored and sealed, and the accumulations formed by later generated hydrocarbon which stored in old deposits and covered by younger sediments.
-
-
![]()
![]()
图 3 东海南部中新生代盆地模拟地层厚度模型
a. T3-J2，b. K12-K2，c. E1，d. E2，e. E3，f. N+Q
Figure 3. Simulated strata thickness model of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic in Southern East China Sea
![]()
图 5 FZ13井实测Ro（%）和地温值（℃）与模拟趋势线对比图
Figure 5. Comparison of measured Ro（%）and ground temperature values（℃）with simulated trend lines in Well FZ13
![]()
图 6 东海南部单井埋藏史
a. S2模拟井，b. FZ10井，c. FZ2井，d. LF1井
Figure 6. Burial history of a single well in South East China Sea
![]()
图 7 FZ10井埋藏史及地层温度剖面图
Figure 7. Burial history and formation temperature profile of Well FZ10
![]()
![]()
图 9 东海南部T3-J1-2层不同时期油气运移路径及聚集单元（红色为气态烃、绿色为液态烃）
a. 135 Ma，b. 65.5 Ma，c. 37.5 Ma，d. 23.3 Ma，e. 5 Ma，f. 0 Ma
Figure 9. Petroleum migration paths and accumulation units（gaseous hydrocarbons in red and liquid hydrocarbons in green）of T3-J1-2 Formations at different stages in the southern East China Sea
![]()
图 10 东海南部K12-K2层不同时期油气运移路径及聚集单元（红色为气态烃、绿色为液态烃）
a. 50 Ma，b. 23.3 Ma，c. 5 Ma，d. 0 Ma
Figure 10. Petroleum migration paths and accumulation units（gaseous hydrocarbons in red and liquid hydrocarbons in green）of K12-K2 Formation at different stages in the southern East China Sea
![]()
表 1 东海南部各构造单元平均沉积速率（m/Ma）简表
Table 1 Average sedimentation rate（m/Ma）for each tectonic units in the southern East China Sea
构造单元 地质时代 J K E1 E2 E3 N1 N2-Q 基隆凹陷带 85 95 100 130 100 250 300 闽江斜坡带 80 85 55 110 剥蚀 180 250 雁荡低凸起带 剥蚀 75 60 100 剥蚀 160 200 瓯江断陷带 剥蚀 剥蚀 60 100 剥蚀 160 180 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 杨长清, 杨传胜, 李刚, 等. 东海陆架盆地南部中生代构造演化与原型盆地性质[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2012, 32(3):105-111. [YANG Changqing, YANG Chuansheng, LI Gang, et al. Mesozoic tectonic evolution and prototype basin characters in the southern East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2012, 32(3): 105-111. [2] 赵汗青, 李德勇, 王海平, 等. 东海陆架盆地南部新生代盆地原型及类比与油气勘探意义[J]. 石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报), 2014, 36(6):21-25. [ZHAO Hanqing, LI Deyong, WANG Haiping, et al. Cenozoic prototype, analogy and the significance of oil and gas exploration in the Shelf Basin of southern East China Sea [J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2014, 36(6): 21-25. [3] 从尧, 刘展, 陆凯, 等. 东海陆架盆地南部中生界的残留厚度[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2017, 33(5):39-44. [CONG Yao, LIU Zhan, LU Kai, et al. Residual thickness of the Mesozoic in the southern East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2017, 33(5): 39-44. [4] 杨艳秋, 杨长清, 杨传胜, 等. 东海陆架盆地西部中生界圈闭特征[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2017, 33(4):49-52. [YANG Yanqiu, YANG Changqing, YANG Chuansheng, et al. Mesozoic traps in the west of the East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2017, 33(4): 49-52. [5] 梁杰, 陈建文, 张银国, 等. 东海陆架盆地西部坳陷带中生界储层类型及成因[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2016, 36(5):131-138. [LIANG Jie, CHEN Jianwen, ZHANG Yinguo, et al. Type and origin of Mesozoic reservoirs in western depression zone of east China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2016, 36(5): 131-138. [6] 杨长清, 韩宝富, 杨艳秋, 等. 东海陆架盆地中生界油气调查进展与面临的挑战[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2017, 33(4):1-8. [YANG Changqing, HAN Baofu, YANG Yanqiu, et al. Oil and gas exploration in the Mesozoic of East China Sea Shelf Basin: progress and challenges [J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2017, 33(4): 1-8. [7] 江东辉, 唐建, 王丹萍, 等. 东海陆架盆地南部及邻近陆域中生代地层格架对比[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2017, 33(4):16-21. [JIANG Donghui, TANG Jian, WANG Danping, et al. Mesozoic stratigraphic framework of the southern East China Sea Shelf Basin and its correlation with adjacent areas [J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2017, 33(4): 16-21. [8] 杨长清, 杨传胜, 孙晶, 等. 东海陆架盆地南部中生代演化与动力学转换过程[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2019, 49(1):139-153. [YANG Changqing, YANG Chuansheng, SUN Jing, et al. Mesozoic evolution and dynamics transition in southern Shelf Basin of the East China Sea [J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2019, 49(1): 139-153. [9] 王蛟, 李智高, 蔡来星, 等. 东海陆架盆地南部中生界沉积模式[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2019, 49(1):131-138. [WANG Jiao, LI Zhigao, CAI Laixing, et al. Sedimentary model of Mesozoic in the southern part of the East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2019, 49(1): 131-138. [10] 龚建明, 李刚, 杨传胜, 等. 东海陆架盆地南部中生界分布特征与油气勘探前景[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2013, 43(1):20-27. [GONG Jianming, LI Gang, YANG Chuansheng, et al. Hydrocarbon prospecting of Mesozoic Strata in southern East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2013, 43(1): 20-27. [11] 杨传胜, 杨长清, 李刚, 等. 东海陆架盆地中-新生界油气勘探研究进展与前景分析[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2016, 38(2):136-147. [YANG Chuansheng, YANG Changqing, LI Gang, et al. Prospecting of Meso-Cenozoic hydrocarbon in the East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2016, 38(2): 136-147. [12] 肖国林, 蔡来星, 郭兴伟, 等. 北黄海盆地东部坳陷勘探突破对我国近海残留" 黑色侏罗系”油气勘探的启示[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2019, 49(1):115-130. [XIAO Guolin, CAI Laixing, GUO Xingwei, et al. Exploration enlightenment on residual " Black Jurassic” in Chinese offshore from exploration breakthrough in Eastern Sag of the North Yellow Sea Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2019, 49(1): 115-130. [13] 梁若冰. 东海陆架盆地南部中生界油气勘探潜力分析[J]. 海洋石油, 2017, 37(3):16-22. [LIANG Ruobing. Analysis of hydrocarbon exploration potential in the Mesozoic of the southern East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Offshore Oil, 2017, 37(3): 16-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2017.03.016 [14] 杨艳秋, 李刚, 戴春山. 东海陆架盆地西部坳陷带中生界分布特征及其有利区探讨[J]. 世界地质, 2011, 30(3):396-403. [YANG Yanqiu, LI Gang, DAI Chunshan. Characteristics of Mesozoic distribution and discussion on its favourable area in Western depression zone of East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Global Geology, 2011, 30(3): 396-403. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2011.03.011 [15] 金春爽, 乔德武, 须雪豪, 等. 东海陆架盆地南部油气资源前景与选区[J]. 中国地质, 2015, 42(5):1601-1609. [JIN Chunshuang, QIAO Dewu, XU Xuehao, et al. Oil and gas potential and target selection in southern East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Geology in China, 2015, 42(5): 1601-1609. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2015.05.027 [16] 牛耀龄. 俯冲带形成、后撤和板块构造动力学的一些基本概念和全新解释: 全球意义、西太平洋弧后盆地的成因与演化及对中国东部的地质影响[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015: 10-29. NIU Yaoling. Some Basic Concepts and Explanations for the Formation, Withdrawal, and Plate Tectonic Dynamics of Subduction Zones: Global Significance, Formation and Evolution of the Western Pacific Back-Arc Basin and Its Geological Impact on Eastern China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015: 10-29.
[17] 舒良树, 周新民, 邓平, 等. 中国东南部中、新生代盆地特征与构造演化[J]. 地质通报, 2004, 23(9):876-884. [SHU Liangshu, ZHOU Xinmin, DENG Ping, et al. Geological features and tectonic evolution of Meso-Cenozoic basins in southeastern China [J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2004, 23(9): 876-884. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2004.09.008 [18] 陈建平, 赵长毅, 何忠华. 煤系有机质生烃潜力评价标准探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1997, 24(1):1-5. [CHEN Jianping, ZHAO Changyi, HE Zhonghua. Criteria for evaluating the hydrocarbon generating potential of organic matter in coal measures [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1997, 24(1): 1-5. [19] 王国纯. 东海盆地油气勘探焦点问题探讨[J]. 中国海上油气(地质), 2003, 17(1):29-32. [WANG Guochun. A discussion on some focal problems of petroleum exploration in East China Sea Basin [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas (Geology), 2003, 17(1): 29-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2003.01.007 [20] 许薇龄, 焦荣昌, 乐俊英, 等. 东海陆架区地热研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 1995, 10(2):32-38. [XU Weiling, JIAO Rongchang, YUE Junying, et al. Geothermal study on the Continent Shelf of the East China Sea [J]. Progress in Geophysics, 1995, 10(2): 32-38. [21] 邱楠生, 胡圣标, 何丽娟. 沉积盆地热体制研究的理论与应用[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2004: 175-190. QIU Nansheng, HU Shengbiao, HE Lijuan. Theory and Application of Study on Geothermal Regime of Sedimentary Basin[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2004: 175-190.
计量
- 文章访问数: 3102
- HTML全文浏览量: 538
- PDF下载量: 29
