南海与典型弧后盆地基底岩石的地球化学对比——大地幔楔背景下的海盆扩张

A geochemical comparison of basement rocks between the South China Sea and typical back-arc basins: Basin expansion in the context of big mantle wedge

  • 摘要: 南海是西太平洋最大的边缘海之一,其成因演化对深入认识西太俯冲带的形成和演变具有重要的意义,然而南海形成的动力学背景和机制目前仍不明确。洋壳基底岩石为认识南海的成因提供重要研究对象,洋壳基底岩石在地球化学特征上的多样性成因可为认识南海的形成与演化提供重要线索。本文开展南海与典型弧后盆地(以马里亚纳海槽和日本海为例)洋壳玄武岩以及开阔大洋洋中脊玄武岩的地球化学对比,南海洋壳玄武岩相比于开阔大洋洋中脊玄武岩具有更高的Al2O3和K2O含量,更低的FeOT和TiO2含量,但微量元素配分模式相似;相比于典型弧后盆地玄武岩,南海洋壳玄武岩则具有更高的MgO和CaO含量,但是微量元素配分模式显著不同,南海洋壳玄武岩具有元素地球化学组成上的独特性。通过排除分离结晶、地壳混染和部分熔融等作用在玄武岩地球化学成因中的影响,本文进一步指出玄武岩地幔源区的岩性和地球化学不均一性是形成南海洋壳玄武岩地球化学多样性的主控因素,显著区别于受小地幔楔演化控制的弧后盆地玄武岩的源区。通过与受大地幔楔影响下形成的中国东南部新生代板内玄武岩在元素和同位素地球化学组成上的对比,进一步表明,南海洋壳玄武岩地幔源区的富集物质组成与中国东南部玄武岩的地幔源区具有相似性。以上玄武岩地球化学对比结果揭示,相比形成于小地幔楔地质过程的弧后盆地,南海的形成演化主要受到大地幔楔背景下物质循环的影响,其深部动力学过程和机制与大地幔楔的演化具有重要关联。

     

    Abstract: The South China Sea (SCS) is one of the largest marginal seas in the western Pacific. Its formation and evolution are of great significance to plate tectonic studies, particularly for understanding the formation and evolution of the western Pacific subduction zone. However, the dynamic background and mechanisms behind the formation of the SCS remain unclear. The oceanic crust basement rocks recorded critical information of the formation mechanism of the SCS. Resolving the diversity in petrogenesis and geochemistry of these oceanic crust basement rocks offers important clues to uncover the formation and evolution of the SCS. We conducted a geochemical comparison of oceanic crust basalts from the SCS with those from typical back-arc basins (such as the Mariana Trough and the Japan Sea) and mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB) from open oceans. Compared to MORB from open oceans, the oceanic crust basalts of the SCS exhibit higher Al2O3 and K2O contents, lower FeOT and TiO2 contents, and similar trace elemental patterns. In contrast to typical back-arc basin basalts, the SCS basalts have higher MgO and CaO contents but different trace element patterns, indicating the unique geochemical characteristics of the SCS basalts. By excluding the effects of magmatic processes such as fractional crystallization, crustal contamination, and partial melting on the geochemical variations of the oceanic basalts, we further believe that the lithological and geochemical heterogeneity of the mantle source are the primary factors controlling the geochemical diversity of the SCS oceanic crust basalts, which distinguish them significantly from the source regions of typical back-arc basin basalts that are controlled by the evolution of small mantle wedge. In addition, by comparing the elemental and isotopic geochemical compositions of the SCS oceanic crust basalts with those of the Cenozoic intraplate basalts in SE China that formed under the influence of the big mantle wedge, we further revealed that the enriched mantle components within the mantle source of the SCS oceanic crust basalts exhibits similarities to those of the SE China basalts. Therefore, unlike typical back-arc basins that formed through geological processes involving a small mantle wedge, the formation and evolution of the SCS were primarily influenced by material circulation in the context of the big mantle wedge. The deep dynamic processes and formation of the SCS basin should be closely related to the evolution of a big mantle wedge.

     

/

返回文章
返回