Characteristics of gas reservoir and controlling factors for gas accumulation in the Huagang Formation in Y Structure, Xihu Sag
-
摘要: 以常规和非常规油气成藏理论为指导，结合储层、流体等测试分析结果，开展西湖凹陷Y构造花港组气藏特征及成藏主控因素研究。结果表明：① 花港组垂向上符合中下部致密砂岩气、上部常规天然气藏的分布序列；② 常规气藏气水关系正常，受断盖配置对沿断裂运移油气的封闭作用和断层侧向封堵能力影响，油气主要在区域盖层之下的断背斜顶部富集；③ 致密气藏具叠覆跨越源储组合关系，含气饱和度低，无明显气水界面，属先致密后成藏类型，不同部位含气性受构造幅度和储层物性共同控制。本次研究丰富和完善了西湖凹陷常规-非常规天然气序列成藏规律，并为致密砂岩气的勘探提供理论指导。Abstract: Following both the conventional and unconventional oil and gas accumulation theories, and upon the basis of the experimental and testing results of the reservoirs and fluids, this paper studied the characteristics of gas reservoirs and the controlling factors on hydrocarbon accumulation in the Huagang Formation in the Y structure of Xihu Sag. And the following research results are obtained. ① there is a vertical distribution pattern of gas accumulation from the middle and lower tight sand gas to upper conventional reservoir gas in the Huagang Formation of the study area. ② Influenced by the sealing of matched fault and cap rock system to oil-gas migration through faults and by lateral migration, the conventional gas reservoirs with a normal gas-water contact are formed and distributed at the top of fault-anticline traps below the regional caprock. ③ The tight sand reservoirs are characterized by separated source-reservoir system, low gas saturation, complex gas-water relationship, and antecedent tight sand reservoir. Reservoirs which have different porosity and located in different structural heights have different gas saturation. The result has an important significance for the study of the accumulation models of the conventional and unconventional gas reservoirs in the Xihu Sag and will provide a guidance for exploration of the tight sand gas.
-
Keywords:
- tight sand reservoir /
- controlling factor /
- Xihu Sag /
- Huagang Formation
-
-
![]()
![]()
图 2 Y构造SE向气藏剖面（a）、H3含气面积图（b）及H3沉积相分布图（c）
Figure 2. SE-direction gas reservoir profile（a）, the gas bearing area of H3（b）, and the depositional facies distribution of H3（c）of Y structure
![]()
图 3 研究区花港组储层及流体分布特征
Figure 3. Distribution of reservoirs and fluids in the Huagang Formation of Y Structure
![]()
图 4 研究区花港组储层孔喉特征
Figure 4. Pore-throat characteristics of the Huagang Formation reservoir in Y structure
![]()
图 5 研究区花港组储层致密化与油气充注关系图
Figure 5. Relationship between sandstone reservoirs densification and hydrocarbon charging in the Huagang Formation of Y structure
![]()
图 6 研究区花港组常规气藏与断层-盖层关系
Figure 6. Relationship between fault-caprock system and the conventional gas reservoirs in the Huagang Formation of the study area
![]()
图 7 研究区花港组致密气藏含气饱和度与储层物性和构造幅度关系
Figure 7. Relationship between physical properties or structural amplitude and gas saturation of the tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Huagang Formation of the study area
表 1 研究区断裂特征
Table 1 Fault features of Y structure
断层 性质 期次 断距/m 断裂产状 区内延伸
长度/km断开
层位T20 T23 T24 T25 T30 走向 倾向 F1 正断层 断陷期-反转期 25～50 10～25 25～75 25～150 NE SE 20.8～49.6 T23-T34 F2 逆断层 反转期 25～150 50～175 75～150 75～125 NE SE 46.9～53.7 T23-T30 F3 正断层 断陷期 10～25 25～75 NNE SEE 7.3～41.2 T25-T34 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 研究区花港组致密气藏物性、幅度和含气饱和度特征
Table 2 Characteristics of physical properties, structural amplitude and gas saturation for the tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Huagang Formation of the study area
构造单元 井名 层位 序号 深度/m 幅度/m 孔隙度/% 渗透率/10-3 μm2 含气饱和度/% A区 YY1 H5 1 4648.3 160 7.8 0.33 40.5 2 4660.1 8.5 0.44 42 均值 8.2 0.39 41.3 YY1 H6 1 4787.3 150 7.1 0.25 40 YY1 H7 1 4848.8 170 7 0.24 49 YY1 H8 1 4961.7 220 7.1 0.25 40 2 4995.3 7.1 0.24 40 3 4999.4 7 0.24 40 4 5036.7 7 0.24 46 5 5068.9 7.1 0.25 41.4 6 5086 7 0.24 40 均值 7.1 0.24 41.2 B区 YY2 H5 1 4611.8 20 7.6 0.3 49.7 YY2 H6 1 4659.1 40 7.8 0.32 55 2 4672.5 7.9 0.34 50 3 4679.5 7.6 0.31 48.9 4 4703.6 7.7 0.31 50.2 均值 7.8 0.32 51 YY2 H7 1 4801.6 100 7.6 0.3 59.8 2 4806.8 7.4 0.28 49.6 3 4837.3 8 0.35 44.6 均值 7.7 0.31 51.3
YY2H9 1 5070.8 270 7.8 0.33 51.8 2 5088.6 7.7 0.32 43.9 3 5099.2 8.1 0.38 52.9 均值 7.9 0.34 49.5
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 戴金星, 倪云燕, 吴小奇. 中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(3):257-264 DAI Jinxing, NI Yunyan, WU Xiaoqi. Tight gas in China and its significance in exploration and exploitation [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3): 257-264.
[2] 康玉柱. 中国非常规油气勘探重大进展和资源潜力[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2018, 37(4):1-7 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-302x.2018.04.001 KANG Yuzhu. Significant exploration progress and resource potential of unconventional oil and gas in China [J]. Oil Forum, 2018, 37(4): 1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-302x.2018.04.001
[3] 魏国齐, 张福东, 李君, 等. 中国致密砂岩气成藏理论进展[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(2):199-210 doi: 10.11764/j.issn.16721926.2016.02.0199 WEI Guoqi, ZHANG Fudong, LI Jun, et al. New progress of tight sand gas accumulation theory and favorable exploration zones in China [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(2): 199-210. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.16721926.2016.02.0199
[4] 赵靖舟, 李军, 曹青, 等. 论致密大油气田成藏模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(5):573-583 doi: 10.11743/ogg20130501 ZHAO Jingzhou, LI Jun, CAO Qing, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation patterns of large tight oil and gas fields [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(5): 573-583. doi: 10.11743/ogg20130501
[5] 叶加仁, 刘金水, 徐陈杰, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷西次凹天然气资源分级评价[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(3):1-9 YE Jiaren, LIU Jinshui, XU Chenjie, et al. Grading evaluation of natural gas resources in the western sub-sag of Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin [J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(3): 1-9.
[6] 黄苏卫, 张传运, 刘峰. 西湖凹陷Y构造花港组黏土矿物特征及对储层物性的影响[J]. 海洋石油, 2018, 38(2):13-20 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2018.02.013 HUANG Suwei, ZHANG Chuanyun, LIU Feng. Clay mineral characteristics of Huagang Formation and impact on the physical property of sandstone reservoir in Structure Y of Xihu Sag [J]. Offshore Oil, 2018, 38(2): 13-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2018.02.013
[7] 李倩, 张萍, 闫洁, 等. 西湖凹陷Y构造花港组致密砂岩储层孔隙演化模式[J]. 海洋石油, 2017, 37(4):29-34 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2017.04.029 LI Qian, ZHANG Ping, YAN Jie, et al. The porosity evolution of tight sandstone reservoir of Huagang Formation in the Y geological structure in Xihu Depression [J]. Offshore Oil, 2017, 37(4): 29-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2017.04.029
[8] 张武, 蒋一鸣, 肖晓光, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷中北部花港组储层致密化过程分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1):86-95 doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101086 ZHANG Wu, JIANG Yiming, XIAO Xiaoguang, et al. Densification process of Huagang Formation in northern and central Xihu Sag of East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2021, 43(1): 86-95. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101086
[9] 徐昉昊, 徐国盛, 刘勇, 等. 东海西湖凹陷中央反转构造带古近系花港组致密砂岩储集层控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1):98-109 XU Fanghao, XU Guosheng, LIU Yong, et al. Factors controlling the development of tight sandstone reservoirs in the Huagang Formation of the central inverted structural belt in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 98-109.
[10] 徐国盛, 崔恒远, 刘勇, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷古近系花港组砂岩储层致密化与油气充注关系[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(3):20-29 XU Guosheng, CUI Hengyuan, LIU Yong, et al. Relationship between sandstone reservoirs densification and hydrocarbon charging in the Paleogene Huagang Formation of Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin [J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(3): 20-29.
[11] 刘勇, 徐国盛, 曾兵, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷花港组储层孔隙演化与油气充注关系[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(2):168-176 doi: 10.11781/sysydz201802168 LIU Yong, XU Guosheng, ZENG Bing, et al. Relationship between porosity evolution and hydrocarbon charging in tight sandstone reservoirs in Oligocene Huagang Formation, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin [J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2018, 40(2): 168-176. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201802168
[12] 苏奥, 陈红汉, 陈旭, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷平湖构造带致密砂岩储层成岩成藏的耦合关系[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版, 2015, 46(3):1016-1026 SU Ao, CHEN Honghan, CHEN Xu, et al. Coupling relationship between diagenetic evolution and oil and gas accumulation of tight sandstone reservoir in Pinghu structural belt in Xihu depression, Eastern Sea basin [J]. Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology, 2015, 46(3): 1016-1026.
[13] 钟韬, 李键, 曹冰, 等. 西湖凹陷花港组储层致密化及其与油气成藏的关系[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2018, 34(1):20-27 ZHONG Tao, LI Jian, CAO Bing, et al. Densification timing of reservoir and its bearing on hydrocarbon accumulation in the Huagang Formation of Xihu Sag [J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2018, 34(1): 20-27.
[14] 彭己君, 张金川, 唐玄, 等. 东海西湖凹陷非常规天然气分布序列与勘探潜力[J]. 中国海上油气, 2014, 26(6):21-27 PENG Jijun, ZHANG Jinchuan, TANG Xuan, et al. Unconventional gas distribution sequence and exploration potential in Xihu Sag, East China Sea [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2014, 26(6): 21-27.
[15] 彭己君, 张金川, 唐玄, 等. 低渗透背景下西湖凹陷致密砂岩气藏的成藏条件[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015, 34(3):107-112 PENG Jijun, ZHANG Jinchuan, TANG Xuan, et al. Formation conditions of tight sandstone gas reservoir in Xihu Sag under the background of low permeability [J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015, 34(3): 107-112.
[16] 苏奥, 陈红汉, 吴悠, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷中西部低渗近致密—致密砂岩气成因、来源及运聚成藏[J]. 地质学报, 2018, 92(1):184-196 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2018.01.013 SU Ao, CHEN Honghan, WU You, et al. Genesis, origin and migration-accumulation of low-permeable and nearly tight-tight sandstone gas in the central western part of Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin [J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2018, 92(1): 184-196. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2018.01.013
[17] 连小翠. 东海西湖凹陷深层低渗—致密砂岩气成藏的地质条件与模式[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2018, 34(2):23-30 LIAN Xiaocui. A model of hydrocarbon accumulation in deeply buried low permeability-high density sandstone gas reservoirs in Xihu Sag, East China Sea [J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2018, 34(2): 23-30.
[18] 唐贤君, 蒋一鸣, 张建培, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷平北区断陷层断裂特征及其对圈闭的控制[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2019, 35(8):34-43 TANG Xianjun, JIANG Yiming, ZHANG Jianpei, et al. Fault characteristic and its control on traps of fault structural layer in the northern Pinghu slope belt, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2019, 35(8): 34-43.
[19] 周心怀, 蒋一鸣, 唐贤君. 西湖凹陷成盆背景、原型盆地演化及勘探启示[J]. 中国海上油气, 2019, 31(3):1-10 ZHOU Xinhuai, JIANG Yiming, TANG Xianjun. Tectonic setting, prototype basin evolution and exploration enlightenment of Xihu Sag in East China Sea Basin [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2019, 31(3): 1-10.
[20] 蔡勋育, 邱桂强, 孙冬胜, 等. 中国中西部大型盆地致密砂岩油气"甜点"类型与特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4):684-695 doi: 10.11743/ogg20200403 CAI Xunyu, QIU Guiqiang, SUN Dongsheng, et al. Types and characteristics of tight sandstone sweet spots in large basins of central-western China [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(4): 684-695. doi: 10.11743/ogg20200403
[21] 赵力彬, 张同辉, 杨学君, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深区块深层致密砂岩气藏气水分布特征与成因机理[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4):500-509 ZHAO Libin, ZHANG Tonghui, YANG Xuejun, et al. Gas-water distribution characteristics and formation mechanics in deep tight sandstone gas reservoirs of Keshen block, Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(4): 500-509.
[22] Law B E. Basin-centered gas systems [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11): 1891-1919.
[23] Northrop D A, Clayton R N. Oxygen-isotope fractionations in systems containing dolomite [J]. The Journal of Geology, 1966, 74(2): 174-196. doi: 10.1086/627153
[24] 付广, 杨敬博. 断盖配置对沿断裂运移油气的封闭作用: 以南堡凹陷中浅层为例[J]. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 2013, 38(4):783-791 doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2013.076 FU Guang, YANG Jingbo. Sealing of matching between fault and caprock to oil-gas migration along faults: an example from middle and shallow strata in Nanpu Depression [J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2013, 38(4): 783-791. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2013.076
[25] 孙永河, 赵博, 董月霞, 等. 南堡凹陷断裂对油气运聚成藏的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(4):540-549 doi: 10.11743/ogg20130417 SUN Yonghe, ZHAO Bo, DONG Yuexia, et al. Control of faults on hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in the Nanpu Sag [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(4): 540-549. doi: 10.11743/ogg20130417
[26] 王国亭, 何东博, 程立华, 等. 吐哈盆地巴喀气田八道湾组致密砂岩气藏气水分布特征[J]. 现代地质, 2012, 26(2):370-376 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2012.02.019 WANG Guoting, HE Dongbo, CHENG Lihua, et al. Gas-water distribution characteristics of tight sand reservoirs in Badaowan Formation in Baka gas field, Tuha Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2012, 26(2): 370-376. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2012.02.019
计量
- 文章访问数: 1951
- HTML全文浏览量: 509
- PDF下载量: 44
