Random noise suppression of marine seismic data based on improved generalized S transform
-
摘要: 常规广义S变换采用固定的高斯窗参数，在时频分析时不能够兼顾高低频端的信号，同时标准S逆变换在时频域滤波时会产生滤波噪音。本文提出了基于变频率高斯窗的广义S变换，同时改进了S逆变换公式。该方法不仅提升了信号时频谱的聚焦度，而且还消除了滤波噪音。通过计算包含随机噪声干扰信号的瞬时信噪比阈值，然后根据不同阈值有针对性的选择压制随机噪音的处理策略。合成数据和实际地震数据处理结果表明，该方法能够有效的压制随机噪音，提高地震数据信噪比。Abstract: Conventional generalized S transform (GST) uses fixed parameters for Gaussian window, which makes it impossible to take into account the high and low frequency signals in the time-frequency analysis. At the same time, the standard S inverse transform produces filtering noise when filtering in the time-frequency domain. In this paper, a generalized S transform based on variable frequency Gaussian window is proposed, and the inverse S transform formula is revised. This method not only improves the focus of the frequency spectrum of the signal, but also eliminates the filtering noise. By calculating the instantaneous signal-to-noise ratio threshold value of the signal containing random interference noise, and according to different threshold values, the processing strategy of suppressing the random noise is selected in a targeted manner. The processing results of synthetic data and actual seismic data show that the method can effectively suppress random noise and improve the signal-to-noise ratio of seismic data.
-
-
![]()
图 1 理想时频谱与不同控制参数的广义S变换的时频谱
a. 理想时频；b. p=0.7，λ=1对应的时频谱；c. p=0.9, λ=1对应的时频谱；d. p=1，λ=1标准S变换时频谱；e. p=1.2，λ=1对应的时频谱；f. p=1，λ=1.2对应的时频谱；g. p=1，λ=0.9对应的时频谱；h. p=1，λ=0.6对应的时频谱。
Figure 1. Ideal time-frequency spectrum and time-frequency spectrum of S transform using different control factors
a. ideal time-frequency spectrum, b. p=0.7, λ=1 corresponding to time-frequency spectrum, c. p=0.9, λ=1 corresponding to time-frequency spectrum, d. p=1, λ=1 corresponding to time-frequency spectrum, e. p=1.2, λ=1 corresponding to time-frequency spectrum, f. p=1, λ=1.2 corresponding to time-frequency spectrum, g. p=1, λ=0.9 corresponding to time-frequency spectrum, h. p=1, λ=0.6 corresponding to time-frequency spectrum.
![]()
图 2 合成信号时频谱图
a. 标准S变换，b. 广义S变换（p=0.8，λ=1），c. 改进的广义S变换（p=0→1，λ=1）。
Figure 2. Synthetic signal time-frequency spectrum
a. the standard S transform, b. conventional generalized S transform (p=0.8, λ=1), c. improved generalized S transform (p=0→1, λ=1).
![]()
图 3 含随机噪声的地震信号时频谱图
a. 标准S变换，b. 广义S变换（p=0.8, λ=1），c. 改进的广义S变换（p=0→1, λ=1）。
Figure 3. Time-frequency spectrum of seismic signal with random noise
a. the standard S transform, b. conventional generalized S transform (p=0.8, λ=1), c. improved generalized S transform (p=0→1, λ=1) .
![]()
图 4 标准S逆变换时频滤波效果图
a. 合成信号，b. 合成信号时频域滤波，c. 时间域滤波效果。
Figure 4. Effect of time and frequency filtering of standard S inverse transform
a. synthetic signal, b. time and frequency filtering of synthetic signal, c. filtering effect of time field.
![]()
图 5 准确滤波结果和不同滤波方法计算的差值
a. 准确滤波结果，b. 标准逆变换计算差值（红色）和改进逆变换（蓝色）计算差值。
Figure 5. Accurate filtering result and difference calculated by different filtering methods
a. accurate filtering result, b. difference calculated by standard S inverse transform (red) and difference calculated by improved S inverse transform (blue).
![]()
图 6 含噪地震记录去噪效果图
a. 48道模拟地震记录， b. 含白噪声的模拟地震记录， c. 去除噪声的模拟地震记录。
Figure 6. Denoising effect for seismic records with noise
a. 48 channels simulated seismic record, b. simulated seismic record with white noise, c. simulated seismic record after denoising.
![]()
图 7 单道信号对比图
a. 加白噪声后与未加噪声单道信号对比， b. 去噪后与未加噪声单道信号对比。
Figure 7. Comparison of single channel signals
a. comparison of single channel signals with noise and those without noise, b. comparison of single channel signals without noise and those after noise reduction.
![]()
图 8 时频域滤波效果对比
a. 不含白噪声模拟地震道的时频谱，b. 含白噪声模拟地震道的时频谱，c. 去除噪声模拟地震道的时频谱。
Figure 8. Comparison of filtering effects in time-frequency domain
a. time and frequency spectrum of simulated seismic channel without noise, b. time and frequency spectrum of simulated seismic channel with white noise, c. time and frequency spectrum of simulated seismic channel after noise reduction.
![]()
图 10 两种方法压制噪声效果对比
a. 改进广义S变换压噪后剖面，b. 传统广义S变换压噪后剖面，c. 改进广义S变换去除的噪声，d. 传统广义S变换去除的噪声。
Figure 10. Comparison of noise suppression effects between two methods
a. denoised profile by improved generalized S transform, b. denoised profile by traditional generalized S transform, c. noise removal by improved generalized S transform, d. noise removal by generalized S transform.
-
[1] Stockwell R G, Mansinha L, Lowe R P. Localization of the complex spectrum: the S transform [J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1996, 44(4): 998-1001. doi: 10.1109/78.492555
[2] 付勋勋, 徐峰, 秦启荣, 等. 基于改进的广义S变换求取地层品质因子Q值[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2012, 47(3):457-461 FU Xunxun, XU Feng, QIN Qirong, et al. Estimation of quality factor based on improved generalized S-transform [J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2012, 47(3): 457-461.
[3] 吴淑玉, 刘俊. 时频分析在北黄海东部坳陷中生界储层的应用[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2016, 36(1): 189-196 WU Shuyu, LIU Jun. Application of time-frequency analysis to the Mesozoic reservoir, eastern depression of North Yellow Sea[J], 2016, 36(1): 189-196.
[4] Pinnegar C R, Mansinha L. The S-transform with windows of arbitrary and varying shape [J]. Geophysics, 2003, 68(1): 381-385. doi: 10.1190/1.1543223
[5] 陈学华, 贺振华, 黄德济. 广义S变换及其时频滤波[J]. 信号处理, 2008, 24(1):28-31 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0530.2008.01.007 CHEN Xuehua, HE Zhenhua, HUANG Deji. Generalized S transform and its time-frequency filtering [J]. Signal Processing, 2008, 24(1): 28-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0530.2008.01.007
[6] 高静怀, 陈文超, 李幼铭, 等. 广义S变换与薄互层地震响应分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2003, 46(4):526-532 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2003.04.015 GAO Jinghuai, CHEN Wenchao, LI Youming, et al. Generalized S transform and seismic response analysis of thin interbeds [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2003, 46(4): 526-532. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2003.04.015
[7] Radad M, Gholami A, Siahkoohi H R. S-transform with maximum energy concentration: Application to non-stationary seismic deconvolution [J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2015, 118: 155-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.04.010
[8] 周竹生, 刘冰. 基于含可变因子S变换的面波压制技术[J]. 物探化探计算技术, 2013, 35(5):555-560 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1749.2013.05.11 ZHOU Zhusheng, LIU Bing. Surface wave suppression technology based on S-transform with variable factor [J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2013, 35(5): 555-560. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1749.2013.05.11
[9] 黄捍东, 冯娜, 王彦超, 等. 广义S变换地震高分辨率处理方法研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2014, 49(1):82-88 HUANG Handong, FENG Na, WANG Yanchao, et al. High-resolution seismic processing based on generalized S transform [J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2014, 49(1): 82-88.
[10] 张固澜, 熊晓军, 容娇君, 等. 基于改进的广义S变换的地层吸收衰减补偿[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2010, 45(4):512-515 ZHANG Gulan, XIONG Xiaojun, RONG Jiaojun, et al. Stratum absorption and attenuation compensation based on improved generalized S-transform [J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2010, 45(4): 512-515.
[11] 陈学华, 贺振华, 黄德济, 等. 时频域油气储层低频阴影检测[J]. 地球物理学报, 2009, 52(1):215-221 CHEN Xuehua, HE Zhenhua, HUANG Deji, et al. Low frequency shadow detection of gas reservoirs in time-frequency domain [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2009, 52(1): 215-221.
[12] Yu Z, McMechan G A, Ferguson J F, et al. Adaptive wavelet filtering of seismic data in the wavelet transform domain [J]. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 2002, 11(3): 223-246.
[13] 赵淑红, 朱光明. S变换时频滤波去噪方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2007, 42(4):402-406 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7210.2007.04.008 ZHAO Shuhong, ZHU Guangming. Time-frequency filtering to denoise by S transform [J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2007, 42(4): 402-406. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7210.2007.04.008
[14] 李雪英, 侯相辉. 基于广义S变换的叠前高频噪声压制[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2011, 46(4):545-549 LI Xueying, HOU Xianghui. Prestack high frequency noise suppression based on generalized S transform [J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2011, 46(4): 545-549.
[15] 王云专, 兰金涛, 龙玉沙. 基于S变换的随机噪声压制方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2010, 25(2):562-567 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2010.02.026 WANG Yunzhuan, LAN Jintao, LONG Yusha. The method for attenuating random noise based on S transform [J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2010, 25(2): 562-567. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2010.02.026
[16] Schimmel M, Gallart J. The inverse S-transform in filters with time-frequency localization [J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2005, 53(11): 4417-4422. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2005.857065
[17] 王德营, 李振春, 王姣. S域时频滤波分析与改进[J]. 石油物探, 2015, 54(4):396-403 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2015.04.005 WANG Deying, LI Zhenchun, WANG Jiao. The analysis and improvement on time-frequency filtering in S-transform domain [J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2015, 54(4): 396-403. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2015.04.005
[18] Pinnegar C R. Comments on “The Inverse S-Transform in Filters With Time-Frequency Localization” [J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2007, 55(10): 5117-5120. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2007.896050
[19] Pei S C, Wang P W. Modified inverse s transform for filtering in time-frequency spectrum[C]//2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. Honolulu, HI, USA: IEEE, 2007: III-1169-III-1172.
[20] 张军华, 藏胜涛, 周振晓, 等. 地震资料信噪比定量计算及方法比较[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2009, 44(4):481-486 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7210.2009.04.018 ZHANG Junhua, ZANG Shengtao, ZHOU Zhenxiao, et al. Quantitative computation and comparison of S/N ratio in seismic data [J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2009, 44(4): 481-486. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7210.2009.04.018
[21] 王小杰, 颜中辉, 刘欣欣, 等. 基于小波分频的Q值补偿技术在东海中深层油气勘探中的应用[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2019, 39(6):200-206 WANG Xiaojie, YAN Zhonghui, LIU Xinxin, et al. The application of formation Q value compensation method based on wavelet frequency division to the exploration of middle-deep hydrocarbon in the East China Sea [J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2019, 39(6): 200-206.
-
期刊类型引用(6)
1. 娄敏，段冬平，何贤科，李文俊，汪文基，李炳颖，荣乘锐，刘彬彬. 海上深层薄“甜点”储层预测——以Z气田H4—H5层为例. 海洋地质前沿. 2025(01): 57-69 . 
百度学术
2. 李晓艳，丁琳，李小平，肖张波，吴琼玲，张月霞，刘金良. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷文昌组凝灰质砂岩储层成岩相及发育模式. 世界地质. 2024(02): 228-241 . 百度学术
3. 胡晨晖. 涠西南A洼现今地温场恢复及有利勘探方向. 复杂油气藏. 2023(02): 154-160 . 百度学术
4. 胡晨晖，徐新德，鲁海鸥. 涠西南凹陷优质烃源岩发育控制因素研究. 石油化工应用. 2022(08): 80-84 . 百度学术
5. 乐靖，井涌泉，梁旭，范洪军，蔡文涛. 渤海低渗透油藏“甜点”地震响应特征及预测. 石油物探. 2022(05): 876-887 . 百度学术
6. 娄敏，杨香华，姚光庆，姜平. 自生黏土矿物与甜点储层的关系——以涠西南凹陷和文昌A凹陷为例. 中国地质调查. 2021(01): 13-23 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(2)
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 5960
- HTML全文浏览量: 501
- PDF下载量: 91
- 被引次数: 8
