王圣洁, 周立君, 孙萍. 科学计量:中国海洋地质40年发展历程与研究热点分析[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2021, 41(6): 1-14. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2021110601
引用本文: 王圣洁, 周立君, 孙萍. 科学计量:中国海洋地质40年发展历程与研究热点分析[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2021, 41(6): 1-14. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2021110601
WANG Shengjie, ZHOU Lijun, SUN Ping. Forty years development of marine geology in China: Evidence from scientometrics[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2021, 41(6): 1-14. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2021110601
Citation: WANG Shengjie, ZHOU Lijun, SUN Ping. Forty years development of marine geology in China: Evidence from scientometrics[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2021, 41(6): 1-14. DOI: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2021110601

科学计量:中国海洋地质40年发展历程与研究热点分析

Forty years development of marine geology in China: Evidence from scientometrics

  • 摘要: 中国的海洋地质学起步于新中国成立初期,此后经历了一段长时间的缓慢积累。直至20世纪70年代末期的改革开放以来,中国的海洋地质才有了快速的进步,逐步发展成为一门独立的学科。利用《海洋地质与第四纪地质》出版的全部文献资源,对过去40年海洋地质学开展科学计量,通过关键词词频统计、共词分析、知识图谱等方法,获得关键词测量的各项指标。研究结果表明:① 过去40年,全部载文篇均新增关键词、年度载文红点指标(RPF)保持稳定,显示出中国海洋地质的快速发展是一个完整的过程,且这一趋势仍将持续15~20年;② 根据“高频关键词集合”,中国海洋地质的研究热点分别是中国近海、西太平洋、两极部分海域,热点学科领域有沉积与环境、地球化学与生物地质、构造地质、陆架第四纪地质、近海盆地油气地质、古气候与全球变化等;③ 根据“突变关键词”的组成,中国海洋地质研究前沿集中在以天然气水合物为主的新能源地质、以板块俯冲机制为核心的西太平洋地球动力学、以中—古生代为目标的深水深层油气;此外,印度洋中脊及相邻海域的资源与环境研究也是一个最新增长点。学科的发展遵循从积累到爆发再到成熟的循环过程,但在过去40年的研究里,很遗憾没有发现中国海洋地质学科革命的转折点。从地球科学的基本发展规律来看,研究区域的不断扩大是推动学科发展的基础,新技术的应用以及调查方法的更新是学科发展的关键。从细分学科领域来看,中国海洋地质各学科分支均包含研究热点和研究前沿,且随着时间不断出现交替变化,这种从前沿到热点最终沉淀为学科基础知识的演化模式,是一个值得进一步探讨的学科评价方向。

     

    Abstract: Modern marine geology was initiated in 1949 in China right after the founding of the People’s Republic. It has experienced a long terms of data accumulation. However, since the Government adopted the policy of reform and opening-up in late 1970s, the marine geology in China has made great progress and rapid development and become an independent scientific discipline. Based on the analysis on all the literatures published in the journal of "Marine Geology and Quaternary Geology", we made a brief evaluation of the past 40 year development of marine geology in China in this paper by means of scientometrics approaches. Several indicators were extracted through key word frequency statistics, co-word analysis, and knowledge graphs. The research results suggest that: (1) In the past 40 years, the number of new key words in all articles and the annual red point factor (RPF) have remained stable, indicating that the rapid development of marine geology is a complete process. And this trend will continue for 15-20 years or more; (2) According to the "high-frequency key word set", the research hot areas of Chinese marine geology remain with China Seas, the western Pacific, and the parts of polar oceans. The hot fields include sedimentology and environment, geochemistry and bio-geology, structural geology, Quaternary geology, petroleum geology of China offshore basins, paleoclimate and global changes, etc.; (3) According to the "burst key words", the frontiers of marine geology research are focused on new energy resources dominated by natural gas hydrates, western Pacific geodynamics related to plate subduction, and the deep oil and gas accumulated in the Mesozoic and Paleozoic. In addition, the resources and environment and the tectonics of Indian Ocean ridge are also the interests of researches. The development of all disciplines will follow a cyclical process from accumulation to explosion and then to maturity. In the past 40 year history of marine geology in China, it is regrettable that no turning point has been observed so far. To consider the development of earth sciences as a whole, the continuous expansion of research areas is doubtlessly the basis for the development of disciplines. And the adoption and application of new technology and updated survey methods remain the keys to the development. To observe all branches of marine geology in China, both research hot fields and research frontiers appear alternately. So, the development model from frontiers to hot fields and finally to basic knowledge is worthy of further discussion.

     

/

返回文章
返回